Google
WWW SNEA Weblog

Friday, October 31, 2008

MNEA/SNEA Election Recommendations

Election 2008 - SNEA and MNEA Recommendations

Unlike other associations that dictate political endorsements from "on-high" to their membership, local affiliates are actively involved in forming political recommendations for MNEA.

An SNEA committee made up of local members spent the better part of two weekends interviewing candidates for the Missouri Legislature from all over our area of the state. Local president, Ray Smith, was part of the MNEA interview team for statewide candidates. SNEA Vice President, Kittilu Maxson (Wilder), represented our local and our region at statewide meetings to help determine MNEA recommendations for state legislature candidates.

Missouri NEA members are Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Improving public education and protecting children are the key issues that unite us and drive our recommendation process.

MNEA's recommended candidates:

President - Barack Obama
Governor - Jay Nixon
Lieutenant Governor - Sam Page
Secretary of State - Robin Carnahan
Treasurer - Clint Zweifel
Attorney General - Chris Koster
Congress 7th District - Richard Monroe

Missouri Legislature

135th District - Nancy Hagan
136th District - Nick Beatty
137th District - Charlie Norr
138th District - Sara Lampe
141th District - Ron Shawgo

Ballot Issues

Amendment 1 (English Language for Govt Meetings, etc.) - MNEA Opposes
Proposition A (Repeal Gambling Loss Limit) - No Position
Proposition C (Renewable Energy Requirement, Investor-Owned Utilities) - MNEA Supports

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Social Security Offsets . . . Update

Presidential Candidate Obama Supports Repeal of Social Security Penalties for Teachers

In a letter to NEA, Presidential candidate Barack Obama expressed his support for repealing the GPO/WEP Social Security Offsets for teachers. The threat of presidential veto has contributed to keeping this issue on the back burner in Congress for years. Now, a presidential candidate has finally spoken out on this important issue for teachers in Missouri and many other states.

The following is part of a October news release from NEA.

RE: Obama Expresses Clear Support for Repeal of Social Security Offsets!!

In an October 22 letter, Senator Obama expressed his clear support for repeal of the Government Pension Offset and Windfall EliminationProvision. As you know, these two offsets unfairly impact tens of thousands of educators. Repeal of the GPO and WEP is a very important issue for many NEA members and a top priority for the Association.

In his letter directed specifically to NEA members, Senator Obama states,

"Nobody should be penalized for serving our children, and that's why I support repealing the GPO/WEP and will work to do so as President...the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset have a serious detrimental impact on hundreds of thousands of educators and your spouses. That's why as a Senator I co-sponsored the Social Security Fairness Act, which would repeal these provisions....I believe that we have a responsibility to take care of workers who have devoted their lives to public service and that we shouldn't discourage young people from working in these essential jobs at a time when so many teachers are at or near retirement age and we're struggling to replace them."

The letter also states, "I will work to repeal GPO and WEP, but I won't stop there. We need to think now about how we provide retirement security for today's retirees and workers retiring 20 or 30 or more years down the road. Let me tell you about my comprehensive plan. It starts with protecting Social Security. It is one of the most successful social programs in American history, and we need to preserve and maintain it, without risky privatization plans....Improving retirement security for educators...will be a high priority for me as President."

The letter concludes with, "I greatly appreciate the support I have from the NEA, and I look forward to working with you as President to create the changes we all want to see in our country."

Monday, October 20, 2008

Teacher Rep Election Recommended by Administration

Board to Consider Recommendation for Teacher Rep Election

The agenda for tomorrow's (October 21) School Board meeting contains an Action Item titled "Teacher Collective Bargaining" that should be of great interest to all teachers in the district. It is very likely that the School Board will vote on a new administration proposal to hold an election for the purpose of collective bargaining with teachers.

The Action Item reads:

Subject: TEACHER COLLECTIVE BARGAINING

A. Pertinent Facts:

1. The Board advised the Administration on October 7, 2008, they were not interested in passing the recommendation for establishing an advisory team to discuss wages, benefits, and working conditions. They instead requested that the Administration bring forth a new recommendation regarding an election for the purpose of collective bargaining.

B. Fiscal Note:

1. Uncertain

C. Recommendations:

1. That the Board direct the Administration to work with teacher organizations toward holding an election or elections for the purpose of choosing a representative or representatives to engage in collective bargaining with the District.

2. That the Board and Administration, with the assistance of its lobbyists, monitor legislation developed in response to the Supreme Court ruling regarding the rights of teachers to collective bargaining in an attempt to ensure compliance with potential statutory requirements.

----------------------------------------

What's Next?

If the recommendation is approved by the board . . . what's next?

You will notice that the language in item C-1 above is carefully crafted and omits any details regarding the establishment of a Bargaining Unit (who votes) or Show of Interest (who or what is on the ballot). These important components of any rep election will no doubt be covered as teacher groups meet with district leadership in the coming days.

SNEA believes that board approval of a representative election is a huge step forward for teachers in our district. Springfield teachers, counselors, nurses, librarians and parent educators have followed this issue, gathered petition signatures and talked about collective bargaining with their colleagues throughout the district. . . and one cannot under-estimate how important that grassroots discussion has been in moving this issue forward.

SNEA also believes that the professionals working closely with students on a daily basis can provide incredibly valuable insights into educational improvements in our district. Collective bargaining is a pathway to more teacher involvement and a mutually respectful partnership with school administration regarding better working conditions for teachers. The rest of the equation is simple:

Better Working Conditions for Teachers = Better Learning Conditions for Students

Our hope is that an election allowing teachers to choose a bargaining agent would soon be followed by good faith negotiations toward a 2009-2010 contract this spring.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Remarks to School Board, October 7

Ray Smith's Remarks to School Board Study Session, October 7, 2008

Mrs. Callen, Dr. Ridder, Board Members and Cabinet:


I am very proud to present to the board 1,140 signatures from Springfield teachers calling for the Springfield R-XII school district to conduct an election so that teachers may choose their own bargaining agent.


The language of the petition is clear: "We the undersigned, in order to execute our rights under the Missouri Constitution, Article 1, Section 29, "employees shall have the right to organize and to bargain collectively through a representative of their own choosing", hereby request the Springfield R-XII School District conduct an election so that teachers, nurses and parent educators may choose either SNEA or SMSTA as their bargaining agent."


In most card campaigns or petition drives of this nature, outside help is required, especially in a district with over 50 buildings and some 1,700 teachers. It is important to note that this particular petition drive was done entirely at the "grassroots" level - conducted teacher-to-teacher in the hallways, classrooms and workrooms across the district.


I'm extremely proud of those teachers who gave their time and put forth a great effort to gather these 1,140 signatures. It is also worth noting that the total far exceeds the membership of any one teacher group in our district.

Supreme Court Decision, May 2007


On May 30, 2007, the Missouri Supreme Court held that Article I, Section 29 of the Missouri Constitution provided that teachers had the right, as public employees, to organize and choose their own representation in order to bargain terms and conditions of employment.


The language of the Constitution is clear when it states that employees have the right to bargain collectively through a representative of their own choosing . . . it's worth noting that neither administrators nor school boards were given the right to choose employee representation - not by committee, not by advisory group . . . only the employees, in this case the teachers, can choose a bargaining agent to represent them.


The customary and accepted way we choose representation in our democracy is by secret ballot election. (By the way, electing a bargaining agent does not require any teacher to join or switch their association membership. Some have been spreading this misconception, and it's simply not true.)

The SNEA proposal reflects a best practice in thousands of school districts across our country and many highly successful districts in our own state. Rockwood, one of our benchmark districts, ratified a contract last spring after a mutually respectful negotiating process.


The proposals put forth by the administration and MSTA vary in title only and are virtually identical in every other respect. They would have the teacher groups form yet another committee to provide input or advice. We've tried that before in 1990 - and in a limited form with a dysfunctional Compensation Committee - and both proved to be totally ineffective.


SNEA has already issued a resolution that expresses our opposition to and our refusal to be a part of any contrived scheme that does not provide teachers with a single, accountable unified voice. We've been down that road before with TAMAC in the early 1990's - didn't work. There is no accountability to such a plan, just more playing of one organization off the other.


Last year, MSTA proposed legislation that eventually died in a Senate committee. Our own State Senator, who is no liberal, characterized the plan as "worse than doing nothing". Now, that plan with slight modification, has re-emerged in this assembly room.


SNEA believes that, in a democracy, representation is chosen through secret ballot elections. It's how all our representatives are chosen, including our representation on the school board. We strongly urge you to make the constitutionally sound decision, the decision that was upheld by the Missouri Supreme Court, the decision that respects the views of at least 1,140 Springfield teachers . . . and vote to allow teachers to exercise their right to choose their own bargaining agent.


Thank You